Pricing Audit

Pricing page teardown · Video messaging

Loom: clarity, trust & conversion friction

Scored · lens: hybrid (self-serve + sales) motion, optimizing for free trial

Overall rubric score

88

Strong — 88/100

The average of our five category scores below. This is our automated reading of the page's HTML on the date shown, not a verdict on the business or a measure of how buyers respond.

By category

  • Clarity100
    • Strength: The title has at least 12 characters.
    • Strength: The page has a meta description of at least 30 characters.
    • Strength: The page has an H1 heading.
    • Strength: At least three plans are named in headings.
    • Strength: At least one US-dollar price is in the HTML.
    • Strength: Monthly or annual billing is mentioned.
    • Strength: The page has at least 150 words of text.
  • Trust55
    • Strength: 2 trust cues are on the page.
    • Gap: Fewer than three trust cues were found in the fetched HTML.
    • Gap: No social-proof wording such as trusted by was found in the fetched HTML.
    • Gap: The fetched HTML does not say that no credit card is required.
    • Strength: A free trial is mentioned.
    • Strength: Security, refund or cancellation terms are mentioned.
  • Plan differentiation100
    • Strength: At least three plans are named.
    • Strength: The page has a table or a compare-plans section.
    • Strength: There are about as many prices as plans.
    • Strength: The page has headings beyond the plan names.
  • CTA friction84
    • Strength: A call to action matches a self-serve conversion goal.
    • Gap: The fetched HTML has more than three distinct calls to action outside navigation.
    • Strength: The free-trial goal is backed by a free-trial mention.
    • Strength: A US-dollar price is on the page.
  • Objection handling100
    • Strength: The page has an FAQ section.
    • Strength: The FAQ has at least two questions.
    • Strength: The page mentions at least three common objection topics.
    • Strength: Billing terms are mentioned.
    • Strength: Support, security or refunds are mentioned.

What the checks found in the page's HTML

The text our checks matched in the HTML of Loom’s pricing page. Matching is automatic and can miss or misread an item, so the live page is the source.

Plan names matched

  • Starter
  • Business
  • Enterprise

US-dollar prices matched

  • $0
  • $18
  • $24

Calls to action matched

  • Sign up
  • Try for free
  • Contact Sales
  • Try our discounted plan

Trust wording matched

  • Do I get a refund if I deactivate members from my Workspace?
  • Security & Privacy

Questions matched

  • Can I start a free trial of paid plans?
  • What's the difference between buying Loom on Loom.com versus Atlassian.com?
  • Why should I consider getting Loom Business + AI?
  • What enterprise-grade security features does Loom offer?
  • What are my payment options?
  • What are Workspaces and who can I add to my Workspace?
  • Do I get a refund if I deactivate members from my Workspace?
  • How is my data used?
  • Is there a discounted Education plan?
  • How do Screenshots work?
  • Annual billing mentioned
  • Monthly billing mentioned
  • Free trial mentioned
  • No-credit-card mentioned
  • Contact-sales path
  • Table or compare section
  • Has FAQ
  • Social-proof wording

What could be clearer

Suggestions from our fixed rubric, based on the matches above. They are our opinion about what to add or make clearer, not a statement about results.

  1. Add trust cues before the buyer hesitates

    medium

    Why: Fewer than three trust cues were found in the fetched HTML.

    How: Add no-risk language, visible customer proof, and a concrete reassurance block near the primary CTA.

    • Trust cues found: Do I get a refund if I deactivate members from my Workspace? | Security & Privacy
    • No logo-wall or testimonial language found in the fetched HTML.

How we scored this

Scored on our 100-point rubric for clarity, trust, plan differentiation, CTA friction, and objection handling on . This is our automated reading of the public page, not Loom's claim. We fetch the page once, without running its scripts, and match named plans, US-dollar prices, calls to action, trust wording, and FAQ questions in the HTML it returns. A browser may show more than this, so "not found" means not found in that HTML. The rubric checks whether these elements are present. It does not measure how buyers respond or how the page converts.

Clarity
Does the HTML name the plans, show US-dollar prices and state billing terms?
Trust
Does the HTML include trust wording such as security, refunds or customer proof?
Plan differentiation
Does the HTML name several plans, with a table or a compare-plans section?
CTA friction
Does a call to action in the HTML match the chosen sales motion and goal?
Objection handling
Does the HTML include an FAQ and mention common objection topics?

Source: https://www.loom.com/pricing (the page we fetched on ).

Pricing Page Teardown: Loom — clarity, trust & conversion friction (November 2026)